Should Hate Speech and Hate Sites Be Banned from the Internet?

Should scorn reference and despise sites be banned from the earnings? 1. Introduction Internet cease be termed as one of the well-nigh revolutionary inventions of the 21st century. However, just like any other amour in the world, it has its positive points and a dark side as well. rough users have made a productive use of this invention patch others use it in a disabilityful manner. One of the most touristy and convenient mode of researching nowadays, is to find the relevant information on the internet. scarcely due to the everlasting cruelty in the world, some information on the internet can prove to be harmful for the respective person.It office be some satiate that gives inappropriate information or establish to exercise its viewers to go on the wrong path. 2. Overview A website that promotes or uses detest speech against race, community, gender, person, religion, nationality etc is called a detest site. The citizenry who are prudent for putting these things on the internet not only take use text but graphics, sounds and animations are also used to influence their readers more. It ability be used to convince people to plug in a certain(p) classify of people who work against some sentiments or people, for e. . StormFront. org armys a hate site against Martin Luther fagot, Jr who was an American activist and a leader. More House College (2008) posits that he is famous for his contributions in the African-American civil right movements. In the supra mentioned site, gist full of hate is written nearly the activist and allege that there is a long list of wrong transactions done by him. The website terms him modern day plastic God. such offend content about the man is possible due to the much proposed concept of independence of speech.This concept focuses on the freedom of writing or saying anything that an individual feels is correct. This verbal freedom also gives the writer the freedom of speech without being accountable fo r doing it. But what these people fail to comprehend is that with freedom of speech comes gereat function as well. They have a responsibility to only convey the message which would not offend anyone or harm anyone in life. 3. Ways to Inhibit Hate Sites in that respect are round 4 billion web pages on the internet therefore it is rattling difficult to ensure that no hate content is pated on them.There are diametrical ways in which this problem is handled by different countries. For e. g. Media Awareness Network (2009) states that according to the Canadian Human Rights Act discussion section 13, any text communicated by any telecommunication means (including internet) that may promote hatred towards a person or any of the hobby things is prohibited 1Race 2Nationality 3Religion 4Gender etc Akdeniz et al (2008) stated that the Turkish governments are very small about the hate content regarding their state and officials.They also take action against the hate sites promoting rac ism and terrorism. Whereas United Kingdom have a relaxed pose towards racist content but are very alert about any hate content regarding their royalty. 4. Effects of Hate Sites on the parliamentary law 4. 1Effect on Children Children of the modern age are also tech-savvy and explore the internet just like adult. Therefore they are liable to exposure to hate sites as much as we are. Childrens minds are like dummy papers and form perception of things very easily.They tend to take number of things more than adults. If they are exposed to such content, a degree of encroachment and negativity is induced in their character. This negativity leads to a negative and discouraging attitude about anything in life which hinders in their achievements. The aggression in their characters leads to making them commit crimes when they grow up thereby making the monastic order unsafe and unproductive. Therefore hate sites should be prohibited to ensure that our youth develop into successful an d positive individuals. 4. 2Communal GroupsIt is a common practice for people to form small groups and communities on the basis of their similar ideas and concepts. The problem arises when they step up being vocal about their ideas in an aggressive manner. Such an pattern is of the Knights Party (2010) The Ku Klux Klan organization in the United States it is one of the biggest hate group organizations in the country. Their aim is to safeguard the rights and interests of the white American, may it be through violent or aggressive means. Their site is recorded to host content full of hate against the African-Americans, Jews and other minorities.They try to influence people to join them in their aims and also use this medium to promote their aggressive rallies. Such inappropriate sites should be banned from the internet. Fig. 1 KKK during their rally 4. 3Terrorist Organizations Nowadays, terrorist organizations also host sites. They convey their objectives to other people and openly state hate content for their enemies. This might influence the innocent people in the ordination and influence them to join these organizations thereby increasing terrorism in the society.They might state incorrect facts about their enemies just so that the people get influenced by the information and join their groups. 5. Sites Chosen for Analysis The sites that were analyzed for the hate speech are as follows http//www. kkk. com/ The official site of The Ku Klux Klan main site advertises hate content against the minorities of the society and claims to safeguard their White supremacy at every cost. http//www. martinlutherking. org/ Content full of hate against Martin Luther King, Jr 6. ConclusionAfter a house-to-house analysis of the topic under discussion, it can be concluded that hate sites on the internet are liable to cause harm to worldly concern and the peace and harmony of our societies. Therefore appropriate laws and regulations should be implemented to shut down the sites which ex0pose people to such inappropriate content. It is also the responsibility of the citizens of the society to report such hate sites to the concerned authorities so that we can hope for a safe future on the internet for our youth. References StormFront. org, Matin Luther A True Historical Examination, Online ready(prenominal) at http//www. artinlutherking. org/ More House College. (2008). Martin Luther King Jr Collection, Online Available athttp//www. auctr. edu/mlkcollection/ Media Awareness Network. (2009). Online Hate and Free Speech, Online Available at http//www. media-awareness. ca/english/issues/online_hate/hate_and_free_speech. cfm, Akdeniz. Y, Altiparmak. K. (2008). Internet Restricted Access A critical Assessment of Internet Content Regulation and Censorship in Turkey, Online Available at http//www. cyber-rights. org The Knights Party, (2010), Online Available at http//www. kkk. com/