Criminal Justice Essay Example for Free

distressing Justice EssayHerbert Packer a professor from Stanford University came up with two cases of how the criminal cleanice constitution works. The two ideals that Herbert Packer had came up with is the crime checker baffle and callable emergence shape.The crime work model is based on conservative values such as aggressive arrest, prosecution and condemnation of criminals and makes the system more efficient and safer for people. The due process potency is basically protecting an individuals propers whether theyre acc apply and to protect the innocent people from conviction. According to the article , neither models should be used because both the crime control and due process model pass both significant strengths and weaknesses. For example, one(a) weakness of a due process model is it only protects the accused individual rights and not the victim. as well the articles claims that both appear to have potential pitfalls and dangers that could threaten both saf ety and security and the individual unblockdoms that have made the United States a beacon of stability and freedom throughout the world. The article likewise states that crime control model is too harsh while the due process model is just soft on the accused individuals. While the crime control model is aggressive arrest and it could be trouble if the police officers arrest the innocent by accident and during the aggressive arrest it may sustain the victims also.This shows that neither models should be used due to all the reasons above.Herbert Packer feels that both methods should be combined to forestall weaknesses in the model while gaining more strengths and less dangers to the society. Also Herbert Packer feels that if the models were combined, itll be the best strategy to deal with crimes days in the future. With the criminal control model being harsh and the due process being more soft on the accused, they would make a great team which adjusting the levels to just right n ot too harsh or too easy. These reasons above states why Herbert Packer feels that both models or methods should be combined.Based on all the facts given to me, I would choose the crime control model because crime control model could actually prevent more crimes while the due process model would increase the amount of crimes a year. Also the crime control model enforces the law while the due process model doesnt. I would prefer the crime control model also because its burst to be safe than sorry and increases the social order in that certain area. Since the due process model is too easy on the criminal, in that respect may be a chance that the individual would agitate another crime and in society it is important to maintain social order or there would be chaos.I also think that if the crime control model is including traffic stops ,wiretapping and surveillance , itll motionlessness protect the victim and the criminal somehow.The crime control model is necessary to make a free so ciety. With the crime control model, the criminal justice system should be more efficient than ever. The crime control model increases the police powers which make the criminal afraid of committing any more crimes. This is shows why I prefer the crime control model over the due process model. Herbert Packer a professor from Stanford University came up with two models of how the criminal justice system works. The two models that Herbert Packer had came up with is the crime control model and due process model. In conclusion, there are many strengths and weaknesses among the models but still the crime control method is more important in order to prevent crimes from increasing.