It’s Time to End Pet Misery Year 11 Draft Essay

In the opinion piece Lets ratiocination Pet Misery, featured in the Herald sunbathe on the 21st of July 2009, author Susie OBrien responds to the issue of animal ruthlessness in Victoria. In an outraged tone, the author pleads with pet lovers and everyone else alike to sustentation a new bill that aims to make animal desexing compulsory, reducing the rate of unwanted byspring and comes of animal cruelty committed against these animals. The writer begins her lean with the wasting disease of beginning rhyme paired with a bromide. A single slam of the pen can save pets from a short life of misery. The alliteration of the two words single and stroke pull ins to a greater extent than focus to the cliche a single stroke of a pen. This emphasises how easily the puzzle could be solved, angering the endorser due to the little that has been done to solve the problem. This proficiency also works to instil guilt within the reader, making it more likely for them to take action in assisting the cause, thereby supporting the writers line to support the compulsory desexing of pets. One technique the writer uses is a frightening statistic that has been juxtaposed in a larger text. In Victoria alone, 300 dogs are put down every day.Thats more than 100,000 a year. This unbelievably shocking statistic is a perfect technique to support the writers contention. It is able to appeal to the fear and perplexity of pet lovers and all other citizens alike. This statistic works very well to draw the readers attention, due to its intelligent position just down the stairs the heading, and works to recruit more people to the cause, as most would be unable to stop reading after being confronted with such a statistic. Additionally, it would inspire more people to support the writers contention and take action to stop all this death.One of the writers strongest persuasive technique is the use of a widely known story paired with strong, emotive language. In a devastating attack, someone hacked off his ears and tail and then left him to die in pain. Through the use of the well-known story round Buckley, an eight week old prim puppy, the writers argument is strengthened in the eyes of numerous readers, as a majority of them would have heard of the story, and resented the horrific act of animal cruelty. Her argument is again reinforced by several instances of colorful language.Phrases like hacked off and die in pain dont exaggerate the malevolence of the crime, but instead work to give the reader a clearer image of the vile act. This then makes the reader feel more strongly about the issue, making it more likely they do something about it. The strong use of visual media paired with the article is successful in giving the story an even greater effect working as the figurative icing on the argument. The largest image that show the extent of Buckleys shocking injuries, is a perfect accompaniment to the text, giving the reader a true idea of the res ult of his terrible wounds.Additionally, the images of pets behind bars, with their innocent eyes, and pretty fearful expression makes the reader compare them to prisoners whom have been wrongly accuse forced to live a life of confinement for anothers crimes. These elements make readers wish to take action ending the injustice, and is effective in supporting the writers contention. The opinion piece, Lets End Pet Misery, is effective in persuading readers to support the authors pact to introduce a law making the desexing of pets compulsory.Whilst using a super angered tone, the writer uses alliteration in conjunction with a cliche to give readers a greater idea of how appalling the governments inaction is. The writer also shocks her readers through the use of an alarming statistic, revealing the true magnitude of the deaths of unwanted animals. Furthermore, the use of a terrifying recital used together with colourful language, as well as the images in the piece alert readers to the severity of the situation and appeal to ones empathy, ultimately encouraging us to share an equally outraged view.